BOB Why FFA Articles and Link Park Really are a Bad Idea
2015.02.13 19:48
Before search engines got wise, a site's site rating was based on keyword match-ups. Learn further on our partner article by clicking emperorreviewsash's Profile - Gap Year. When webmasters stock-piled their sites with keywords, the incorrect sites were receiving too much attention. Google decided to focus on a site's 'recognition' rather. How many incoming links became the focus of PR requirements. The theory behind this technique was that if lots of internet sites link to still another site, that site would contain valuable information. To compare additional info, please have a view at: link emporer. For alternative viewpoints, please consider checking out: link emperor result.
But again, webmasters got sneaky. With this tendency, we started to start to see the evolution of 'Link Farms' and 'Free-for-All' (FFA) websites. These pages were essentially a collection of (quite often) ineffective links. Typically, the sites were not labeled or detailed. To be able to make their site appear very popular they became a place for webmasters to eliminate their links.
This tactic worked for some time, but soon search-engines caught on. 'Link Farms' and FFA internet sites served no purpose to web users. Since Google prides it self on catering to users (and PERHAPS not developers), a solution must be produced. 'Link Farms' were filling up the web and making it harder for people to find useful resources on the web.
Google soon began to rate the standard of the links that decided a site's 'link pop.' 'Link Farms' and FFA sites became labeled as spam, and hence brought no importance into a site's link popularity.
Today, submitting to some 'Link Farm' or FFA site could be bad for your website's name. Google requires a strong position against these kinds of link pages. At best, the 'Link Farm' can get down your standing and make it harder for the useful sites to work in your favor. At worst, your site is going to be BANNED entirely for using junk sites to try to create traffic. This is a very real possibility.
'Link Farms' and FFA web sites present almost no value. Even though it may appear attractive, consumers won't get quality or related links from the submission. If you are concerned by sports, you will seemingly want to discover about Search Engine Optimisation And Reciprocal Links · Storify. Plus, who wants to see their link among 'trash' websites for adult entertainment, online dating sites, and casinos? Distributing to 'Link Farms' does not contribute to your credibility and is simply not worth the risk.
Alternatively, spend your own time submitting to reliable websites and exchanging links with other relevant sites. The process might be time-consuming, nonetheless it will be the only way to build safe, site-specific traffic.
For a less strenuous method to the tedious directory submission procedure, and to Submit your site to 300+ link websites fast and easy we recommend Directory Submitter..